Proceed to contents

Leuven-Bonn-Delft Workshop on AI and Sustainability

28 Feb 2025 11:00 - 17:00

The impact of training and deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) on the environment is an urgent issue, that has only recently started receiving attention. The common image of AI as something invisible, untouchable, and automatic is a false one. AI has a material and social reality, because AI development and use consumes massive amounts of energy and water, and is still highly dependent on human labour. To raise awareness about the (un)sustainability of AI, and discuss its moral importance, researchers from the KU Leuven (Belgium), University of Bonn (Germany), and TU Delft (The Netherlands) are organizing a joint workshop on AI and Sustainability.

Practical information:

28 Feb 2025 11:00 - 17:00
Leuven Institute of Philosophy & online
English
Target audience: everyone, researchers

Want to register?

  • Price: gratis
More info & registration ⇗

Georganiseerd door:

The Leuven-Bonn-Delft Workshop on AI and Sustainability will take place at the KU Leuven’s Institute of Philosophy, on February 28th. Nynke van Uffelen (TU Delft), Lode Lauwaert (KU Leuven), Tijs Vandemeulebroucke (Bonn Sustainable AI Lab), and Rosalie Waelen (Bonn Sustainable AI Lab) will be presenting their ongoing research on AI and sustainability.

You are warmly invited to participate. This will be a hybrid event, meaning that participation is possible online and in-person. Participation is free of charge, but registering beforehand is required.

Program

11.00 - 11.15 Welcome and introductions

11.15 - 12.00 Talk 1 (Lode Lauwaert)

  • Topic: A scoping literature review on the role of ethics in research on the environmental impact of AI
  • Paper by: Kudina, Van Uffelen, Lauwaert & Landuyt

12.00 - 12.45 Talk 2 (Nynke van Uffelen)

  • Topic: Towards an Environmental Ethics of Artificial Intelligence
  • Paper by: Van Uffelen, Lauwaert, Coeckelbergh & Kudina

12.45 - 14.00 Lunch break (not provided)

14.00 - 14.45 Talk 3 (Rosalie Waelen)

  • Topic: Considering the social and economic sustainability of AI
  • Paper by: Waelen & Van Wynsberghe

14.45 - 15.30 Talk 4 (Tijs Vandemeulebroucke)

  • Topic: Artificial intelligence as “medicine”. On the dubious ethical nature of artificial intelligence in sustainable healthcare.
  • Paper by: Vandemeulebroucke

15.30 - 17.00 Reception (provided)

Abstracts

1. A scoping literature review on the role of ethics in research on the environmental impact of AI

Kudina, Van Uffelen, Lauwaert & Landuyt

While studies about the environmental impact of AI have begun to emerge in the past few years, this emergent knowledge brings about new ethical questions and dilemmas. For example, what falls under the scope of the environmental impact of AI? Are there any ethical reflections accompanying their reporting? If so, which ethical theories guide the normative considerations about the environmental impact of AI? In this study, we conduct a systematic literature review on (1) the findings about the environmental impact of AI systems, (2) whether normative conclusions are drawn based on this knowledge, and (3) if so, how these normative conclusions are justified. Considering the extent and urgency of the environmental degradation that AI is not only helping to solve but also actively contributes to, a question arises on the need to expand the traditional first-line of ethical response with more speculative ethical starting points, for instance, grounded in the ethics of relations and more-than-human ethics. The findings in this study highlight gaps in the literature and formulate a novel research agenda on how ethics can help in dealing with the environmental impact of AI.

2. Towards an Environmental Ethics of Artificial Intelligence

van Uffelen, Lauwaert, Coeckelbergh & Kudina

In recent years, increasing attention has been drawn to the environmentalimpact of AI. Particularly, the development and training of AI systems require significant amounts of energy, water, and raw materials. This raises new ethical questions, such as: when is it (un)justifiable to develop an AI system, considering its environmental impact? This question has been scarcely addressed in the academic literature. To tackle this question, this article draws from environmental justice scholarship. In that field, three categories of justice are distinguished, referring to three elements that can be unjust: the distribution of benefits and burdens (distributive justice), decision-making procedures (procedural justice), and institutionalized social norms and relations (justice as recognition). Based on these distinctions, we outline criteria for determining the ethical admissibility of AI, given its ecological impact.

3. Considering the social and economic sustainability of AI

Waelen & van Wynsberghe

Although sustainability is usually understood as having three dimensions – the environment, society, and the economy – the debate on sustainable AI, so far, is characterized by a narrow focus on the environmental sustainability of AI. The aim of this presentation is to argue that the debate on sustainable AI should not only be about AI’s environmental costs, but also incorporate social and economic concerns. Through an analysis of existing literature on the sustainability of AI, it is demonstrated that arguments about the importance of considering the environmental costs of AI apply just as well to the social and economic dimensions of AI development.

4. Artificial intelligence as “medicine”. On the dubious ethical nature of artificial intelligence in sustainable healthcare.

Vandemeulebroucke

Healthcare entails an ethical paradox. While it undeniably contributes to the improvement of human health, it also contributes to current climate and environmental crises. By doing so, healthcare also negatively impacts environmental determinants of health. Indeed, healthcare is a major contributor to greenhouse gases, depends on the extraction of natural resources to procure medical goods, and produces huge amounts of waste. In the context of current nature crises and their effects on health, healthcare’s environmental impact needs to be confronted. The use of artificial intelligence in healthcare, with its promised potential to make different healthcare practices more efficient, could be seen as a “medicine” for the ethical paradox in which healthcare finds itself in, leading to more sustainable healthcare. Artificial intelligence, however, has its own grave impact on current nature crises which is becoming increasingly evident. As such, artificial intelligence seems to contain its own “noxious” effects on human health. In this presentation I will first give an overview of healthcare’s and artificial intelligence’s impact on the climate and nature and how this impact affects human health. After, the ethical tensions of these impacts will be laid bare. In a final step, a rather structural stance will be taken by relying on the discourse of global bioethics in an attempt to avoid the dubious nature of both healthcare and artificial intelligence by questioning what we mean with “human health” so to open imaginaries of sustainable health for all.

Teachers / speakers

Lode Lauwaert (1981) is professor at the KU Leuven Institute for Philosophy. His interests are situated in current French philosophy, technical philosophy, aggression in all its facets and philosophy of football. He regularly translates philosophy for a wider audience, via readings and media contributions. He recently published the book ‘Wij Robots” (We, Robots) with Lannoo Publishers.

Nynke’s research is dedicated to energy ethics and justice, combining climate ethics, environmental justice and political philosophy. She is interested in situations in which there is normative uncertainty, e.g., uncertainty about what is 'just' or 'ethically right', due to clashing conceptions of justice. In this, she explores relational approaches to justice, such as theories of justice as recognition. Currently, she is a Postdoctoral Researcher in the JustETrans project, where she studies local participation in energy decision-making for just energy transitions, and the use of complex multi-modelling therein.

Research focus:

  • AI ethics

  • Applied ethics

  • Practical philosophy

  • Philosophy of technology

  • Critical theory

Research Areas:

  • Care ethics

  • Bioethics

  • Ethics of technology

  • Environmental ethics

  • Phenomenology

  • Deconstruction

  • Grounded theory